ma'am | 0:45.3 - 1:01.9
compromise | 2:30.9 - 3:26.9
won't | 0:17.1 - 1:05.3
learning a lesson || 0:33.7 - 1:20.3
hey mary | 1:29.8 - 1:44.8
dinner's on | 2:04.7 - 2:34.7
120 bpm | 0:44.6 - 1:22.1 | 37.5 seconds
if this were being prosecuted | 5:43.4 - 5:48.4
no word | 1:14.6 - 1:29.6
clean out your ears | 1:33.4 - 1:50.7
80 beats per minute | 2:53.3 - 3:08.3
probably not | 0:19.2 - 0:56.5
feel a little bit guilty ||| 0:33.7 - 1:03.4
80 bpm | (750ms per step) | 2:13.8 - 2:25.8
when it is | 3:31.0 -3:45.9
davinci & | 0:28.3 - 0:58.3
by accepting | 5:53.3 - 6:03.6
out of an old comic book? | 1:55.3 - 2:48.6
rekal inc || 1:27.5 - 2:18.9
so your only problem would be all the people that can't cough up the money you stole?
may pull the above line. just wanted to make sure i heard you okay. still using twitter or facebook? maybe you'd never heard the story of ashley madison. too long, didn't check the reference? long story short: they ran a 'dating' website to combine rehashing mobile phone style pay-to-text with some then contemporary, texting-capable bots. the people they allegedly scammed were predominately men seeking women. they were also alleged to have run other scams, but not as significantly. can't understand why anyone would use twitter or facebook without a bot-assisted interface because of the impossibility of dealing unaided with either plainly bot accounts or the sheer number of legitimate users. how are you supposed to see who's there without turning on a light?
theguardian.com/film/2020/jun/01/total-recall-paul-verhoeven-at-his-best | rekal inc 0:28.5 - 1:16.5
